April 1, 2009
Filipino lesbian mother faces deportation from US
By News Editor
A 43-year old woman faces likely deportation to the Philippines on Friday leaving behind her partner of 23 years and two twelve-year-old twin sons who were conceived invitro using her American partner's eggs.
Shirley Tan and her partner Jay Mercado, a naturalised citizen born in the Philippines, were married in San Francisco in 2004 but their marriage was voided among the other 4,000 marriages performed by the city of San Francisco. The California's Supreme Court ruled that Mayor Gavin Newsom overstepped his authority when he ordered city hall officials to begin issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.
Even if it still were in effect, the federal Defense of Marriage Act prevents Mercado from sponsoring her partner of 23 years for immigration. Were the pair a married opposite-sex couple, advocates say, Tan could be legal.
The couple are both the legal parents of their boys who are US citizens. Tan now wears an ankle bracelet assigned by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who knocked on the front door at 6.30 am on Jan 28 this year, according to media reports.
Immigration Equality released a press statement on Mar 27 highlighting the US’ discriminatory immigration laws saying: "We hope the press will generate US government interest in staying the deportation, and understanding of the need for passage of the Uniting American Families Act to stop the destruction of our families."
Immigration Equality press release:
CALIFORNIA — Immigration Equality today spoke out about a California family that may soon be torn apart. Due to immigration laws that discriminate against lesbian and gay couples, Shirley Tan will likely be deported April 3, separating her from her life partner Jay Mercado, their twelve-year-old twin sons, and Jay's mother, for whom Shirley is the primary caretaker. The deportation will send Shirley back to the Philippines, where she was a victim of extreme violence.
"From the moment my sons were born we have never been apart. It's tearing me apart to have to leave without them," said Shirley.
Unlike married straight Americans, Jay cannot sponsor her life partner for immigration. The Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) would remedy this discrimination against gay and lesbian Americans and allow them to sponsor their partners for immigration. The bill, introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy in the Senate and Rep. Jerrold Nadler in the House, has 107 additional cosponsors in the Senate and House.
Shirley and Jay are also seeking a private bill from their members of Congress for a stay of deportation, so that they can stay together in the US or have time to make plans to uproot their family and move together to another country.
"Once again a family is on the verge of being torn apart because U.S. immigration laws discriminate against gays and lesbians," said Immigration Equality Policy Director Julie Kruse. "We hope the U.S. government takes immediate steps to keep Shirley and Jay and their children and parents together, and that Congress passes the Uniting American Families Act so the destruction of our families ends."
Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA-12) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who represent Shirley and Jay in Congress, have cosponsored the Uniting American Families Act.
"Shirley Tan's unacceptable situation is just one example of why Congress must pass immigration equality legislation. The Uniting American Families Act, which I co-sponsored, will allow lesbian and gay Americans to sponsor their permanent partners for residency in the United States," said Rep. Jackie Speier. "In the near term, I am confident that any official who examines the facts in Shirley Tan’s case will come to the conclusion that this hard-working mother of two should not be sent to a country where she has no support network and was the victim of a horrific act of violence."
Victoria Neilson, Immigration Equality's Legal Director, stated, "There may be no options for this family under existing law. How can they explain to their children that the U.S. Government does not consider them a family?"
This week, the White House issued a statement about the Uniting American Families Act, saying "[President Obama] thinks Americans with partners from other countries should not be faced with a painful choice between staying with their partner or staying in their country."
37 thousand couples across the nation face similar circumstances.
This STINKS! What else can I say?
ReplyDeleteExcept that I hope Obama gets his finger out fast, because his nice thinking isn't going to prevent children from losing a parent.
ReplyDeleteYou know what, I'm sure despite the fact that the parents are gay and the circumstances under which their family is founded on seems unconventional, they overlook the fact that these 4 people are in fact A FAMILY. Their ties are most probably stronger than the typical American family, which usually ends in broken homes due to divorce, 50% of the time.
ReplyDeleteAnd talking about overstepping boundaries,who the hell are they to forcibly tear this family down?
Uniting the American Families, MY ASS!
Absolutely agree with you on all levels.
ReplyDeleteI saw this episode on Sesame Street a few years ago, and Elmo (yes, I know, Elmo) had a special on families. When Elmo showed different examples of families (tried looking for the vid on YouTube but found the Amazon listing for the DVD instead, so free promotions right here: Elmo's World -- Families, Mail & Bath Time) even he showed a gay couple with a child as an example of "family." But then again, Sesame Street has always been a Democratic (meaning generally equally-minded and of the Democrat Party) anyway.
I blogged about it the first time I saw it (January 2007 -- for some reason, that entry has been corrupted and deleted, but I have it on cache). Back then, I wasn't so sure about granting homosexuals the right to get married. Now I'm sure: it is their right to get married, especially since it was -- at least in California anyway -- already given to them, and then they took it away.
I know! And now, null and void daw all gay marriages? (Did I get that bit right?) Anyway, the bottomline spells INJUSTICE.
ReplyDeleteOn a similar note, do you know that here in our beloved country, the government and police took action AGAINST heavy metal music? Satanic ek ek daw. That's so Black Sabbath circa 1970's. I think they don't have anything better to do with their time.
Wha--!?!? OK, that's just wrong. That's not even logical. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
ReplyDelete